|
|
| Author |
Message |
Feuerdrache
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:02 pm Post subject: BGW Suicidal Martyrdom |
|
|
Here it is - what promises to be the best aggro deck in the environment.
// Land
4 Godless Shrine
4 Temple Garden
4 Overgrown Tomb
2 Vitu-Ghazi, the City-Tree
3 Swamp
2 Plains
3 Forest
// Creatures
4 Dark Confidant
4 Shrieking Grotesque
4 Loxodon Hierarch
4 Ghost Council of Orzhova
4 Dryad Sophisticate
4 Silhana Ledgewalker
3 Blind Hunter
// Other Spells
4 Mortify
4 Putrefy
3 Moldervine Cloak
The sideboard's in limbo - the most recent suggestion has been transformational into control.
Well, there it is. test... and believe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ant900
Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Posts: 2484 Location: somewhere
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
-3 hunter
+3 watchwolf
i would also suggest getting rid of a council for a wolf, but that is optional, but i think this change is nessisary |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_guy_123
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 125 Location: Quebec
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | but that is optional, but i think this change is nessisary |
Does that make sense?
Anyways nice deck. Put Faith's Fetters in SB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ant900
Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Posts: 2484 Location: somewhere
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the_guy_123 wrote: | | Quote: | | but that is optional, but i think this change is nessisary |
Does that make sense?
Anyways nice deck. Put Faith's Fetters in SB. |
i was just saying that wolf is strictly better than blind hunter, and that it was a personal preferrence of mine to only play 3 council rather than 4, if he wants to play 4 it doesnt make the deck much weaker at all, but playing blind hunter over wolf is
Last edited by ant900 on Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HIPPY? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yoyoyo it looks a little slow. maybe some signets or farseeks idk i think it needs some excel and dark confidanr+ hierarch+ghost council+blind hunter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Draktorn
Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ant900 wrote: | [
i was just saying that wolf is strictly better than blind hunter, |
A better card for this deck? Probably.
Strictly better? No. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Void06
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
YOU=RETARD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RAVNICA BLOCK CONSTRUCTED??? xD
i aggre with -1 council -3 blind hunter for +4 watchwolf.
sb probably faith's fetters,castigate(md should be nice too),moratorium stone(???),savra vs aggro,etc... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feuerdrache
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't like Faith's Fetters in this deck too much, but it'll likely go in just because Artifact and Enchantment kill is so damn expensive in this block.
Not sure about Watchwolf, but in the end it's most likely the better choice. I'll have to test it later.
Oh yeah, the sideboard's undecided because I'm not entirely sure of the meta or how to abuse it. What do you guys think is a decent meta? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even after -1 Ghost Council, I think 3 is too many. Maybe -1 more Ghost Council for Grave-Shell Scarab, perhaps?
RBC meta is completely up in the air, so best way is to find deck's weaknesses first, then put solution cards there. How's your testing so far? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GP
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 19 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
having 3 forest and 2 Vitu-Ghazi (5 no black-white mana source) i think its hard to play Ghost Council of Orzhova ...
-3 blind hunter
-3 Ghost Council
-4 Silhana Ledgewalker
+2 land
+4 watchwolf
+4 castigate
what about shambling shell or grave-shell scarab for sb?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GP
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 19 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
need help here!
// Lands
4 [RAV] Temple Garden
4 [GP] Godless Shrine
4 [RAV] Overgrown Tomb
4 [US] Swamp (4)
6 [9E] Plains (3)
2 [TE] Forest (1)
// Creatures
4 [RAV] Watchwolf
4 [RAV] Dark Confidant
4 [RAV] Loxodon Hierarch
4 [GP] Shrieking Grotesque
4 [RAV] Selesnya Guildmage
4 [GP] Ghost Council of Orzhova
// Spells
4 [RAV] Putrefy
4 [GP] Mortify
4 [RAV] Faith's Fetters
// Sideboard
SB: 4 [RAV] Seed Spark
SB: 4 [IN] Cremate
SB: 4 [GP] Castigate
SB: 3 [RAV] Grave-Shell Scarab
thankz  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feuerdrache
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GP wrote: | having 3 forest and 2 Vitu-Ghazi (5 no black-white mana source) i think its hard to play Ghost Council of Orzhova ...
-3 blind hunter
-3 Ghost Council
-4 Silhana Ledgewalker
+2 land
+4 watchwolf
+4 castigate
what about shambling shell or grave-shell scarab for sb?! |
Undo those changes. >.>
Deck fixed.
Not kidding, by the way. It really isn't hard at all to play Ghost Council. Try testing it.
I did wind up cutting Ghazi, though I cut it for bouncelands (1 Rot Farm and 1 Basilica, namely). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|